Palm
Sunday. 07 April
1, 2007
The first Christians regarded the crucifixion
as a rich and
complex mystery.
It was a concrete historical event,
a tragic, bloody
execution.
But it’s meaning was deep, awesome, inexpressible.
It was an essential part of our salvation,
– but
how it saved us was beyond words or logic.
We could only grasp pieces of it
with multiple
explanations.
That’s why our Scriptures contain four separate
accounts
of the Crucifixion
– each with its own distinct feel,
its own different
interpretation.
The Epistles offer still more ways of glimpsing its meaning.
In just two pages of Romans alone, Paul gives
eight different
ways to understand it.
St. Irenaeus, St. Athanasius, and St. John Crysostom,
spun out even
richer interpretations.
But a thousand years after the fact,
a single new
interpretation took hold.
St. Anselm invented it and John Calvin refined it.
They conceived of a moral algebra equation in which
x quantity of sin must be satisfied by x quantity
of suffering,
because God insists that moral equations be balanced.
This doctrine compressed the ineffable mystery
of Christ’s
atoning death
into a logical party-line
dogma,
with one prescribed response
we are supposed to have.
Now, whether we see a Jesus movie, read our Bible,
or partake
of the sacrament,
the model of
God’s algebra equation
is the lens through
which we see.
That doctrine does a great deal of harm.
If you want to know more about that, I invite you to read
Fr. Gray Temple’s
The Molten Soul.
But I won’t argue against it myself today.
I only ask you to lay it aside for a few minutes,
to lay it aside
just long enough to see another view,
a view closer
to the way St. Luke tells the story.
Throughout Luke’s Gospel,
Jesus is always
healing and reconciling,
showing us that healing
and reconciling
are Godly actions.
They are the actions that make God “God.”
God isn’t keeping a moral ledger and punishing.
God isn’t thirsting for anyone’s blood.
And that isn’t what’s happening in crucifixion.
The late New Testament scholar, Raymond Brown,
observed
that in Luke’s Gospel,
as Jesus
proceeds through each step of his Passion,
he keeps on
healing and reconciling.
He somehow reconciles Herod and Pilate;
he forgives
and reconciles the dying thief;
he forgives
and intercedes for his persecutors.
The God Jesus reveals isn’t intent
on someone
paying a price
to satisfy his sense
of justice.
He’s intent on healing our broken hearts
and our
broken relationships.
Jesus becomes the victim of sin
so that
he can forgive sin.
The cross gives him the right to do that.
And when he invites us to take up our cross
it’s
so that we can forgive too.
Jesus’ mission was reconciliation.
Paul says,
“In
Christ, God was reconciling the world to himself,
not
counting their trespasses against them,
and entrusting
the message of reconciliation to us.”
Point one: Jesus went to the cross to reconcile.
Point two: He calls us to follow him.
He gives us the mission
of ongoing reconciliation
That’s why the Catechism says the Church’s
mission
is to reconcile
all people to God and each other in Christ.
The cross represents the central paradox of Christian
life.
We are here to reconcile,
but reconciliation
is not cozy.
It isn’t sentimental.
It doesn’t consist of snuggling up to each other.
Reconciliation isn’t so much about closeness
as it is about
a healthy emotional distance.
The first thing we have to forgive people for
is being themselves
instead of our puppets,
following their
own paths instead of conforming
to our expectations,
acting like
the stars in their own narcissistic dramas
instead of
being the supporting actors in our drama.
In Genesis God creates the world
not by commanding
things to be,
but rather by allowing
them to be.
“Let
there be light.
Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures.”
It’s even more clear in the Kabala,
God creates
the world by setting it free
to be itself,
not his puppet.
Reconciliation is a continuation of the same process
God began in
creation.
By forgiving sinners, Christ lets them be.
God reconciles the world to himself
not by dominating
it
but by allowing it to be
itself
– even
when it goes drastically wrong.
The troubles among human beings
do not lie
so much in our indifference to each other,
as in our over-investment
in each other,
our insistence
that other people be
what we want them
to be.
We all want reconciliation, but we want it on our terms.
We want people to say,
“Oh
yes, now I see. Of course you are right.
I’ll
do it your way.”
But it doesn’t happen.
Reconciliation is possible
only
when we forgive each other
for being
the perverse idiosyncratic characters
that they are.
Rilke gave us the best description of reconciliation
I have
ever encountered.
He said:
“Once
the realization is accepted
That
even between the closest human beings
Infinite
distances continue to exist
A wonderful
living side by side can grow up
If they
succeed in loving the distance between them
Which
makes it possible for each to see the other
Whole
against the sky.”
Creation and reconciliation are huge risks.
They take courage.
They take faith.
Anxiety makes us take control of situations,
try to
dominate the players,
determine
the outcomes.
Faith lets the wind carry us.
God has shown enormous faith in us
by the
act of creation
and the
act of reconciliation.
God invites us to join in that faith,
by forgiving
one another
and waiting
patiently for each of us
to flower in
our own way.
Amen.